Infra-Red With Digital cameras
by Chris Maddock
|
|
Infrared photography is not restricted to film users,
but can be possible for many digital camera users.
This article is intended to explain a little about
how to take digital IR photos, what equipment
is needed and how to process the images. I've
split it into several sections for clarity;
Cameras and Lenses
Filters
Taking the images
Conventional Monochrome IR processing
False-colour IR Processing
Dealing with “Hotspots”
|
| Cameras
and Lenses
Not all digital cameras can take IR photos. To reduce
IR blooming in images the sensor assembly often
includes an infrared blocking filter, which rather
restricts what can be done if you do want IR.
The first thing to do if you want to try it is
to find out if your camera can see IR with any
degree of success. The easiest is to look on the
Internet to see if anyone is already successfully
doing IR with the same model. If you have no luck
there then you can at least test to see if your
camera can at least see any IR light. All you
need is a TV remote control – in a darkened room
point it at the camera (and the camera at it)
and take a photo whilst holding down one of the
buttons on the remote. If the resultant image
shows a bright spot then the camera can see IR
light. Unfortunately, that is all it will tell
you. To test further you need an IR filter.
Lenses can also be a source of problems. Some lenses
have coatings that will cause a bright “hotspot”
in the middle of the image, which will render
them unusable for IR work. In some cases the hotspot
is not excessive and can be dealt with in Photoshop
– I’ll cover how I deal with this on my Canon
G5 at the end of the article. A partial list of
Canon lenses that do and do not cause a hotspot
can be found here
|
| Filters
There are quite a number of these on the market, the
principle difference being at what point in the
light spectrum they block light. Sometimes (but
not always) the filters have names based on the
cut-off point, a higher number cuts off more visible
light, if the name doesn’t relate to the cut-off
point then a visit to the manufacturer’s specs
will give the answer. Some filters are available
as screw-in types in different sizes, others are
gel type filters which tend to be cheaper but
harder to handle and less durable.
Many people use an R72 or Wratten 89B filter, which cuts
out light wavelengths under 720nm (nanometres),
but these tend to be expensive – especially when
experimenting. A 49mm Hoya R72 filter is around
£24, the price can increase sharply for bigger
sizes.
A cheaper alternative is the IR87 from the Lee
technical filters range. This cuts off at 730nm
and is a gel filter. A 100mm square will cost
around £13 and can be cut to mount in a Cokin
P-series frame or cut to size to make several
for lenses that take rear mounted filters.
An even cheaper alternative if you can find it is Ilford’s
SFX filter. This is intended for use with SFX200
InfraRed film. Although Ilford don’t state the
cut-off point they do list the R72 and Wratten
89B as suitable alternatives. I reckon the cut-off
point is lower than those since I can just about
see through it (unlike the others) which means
it is passing some visible light. This is my personal
preference since I like to produce false-colour
IR photos and some visible light is needed for
these. The SFX filter is a gel filter in Cokin
A and P sizes. Unfortunately, I have been unable
to find an Internet supplier since the partial
demise of Ilford – however some dealers may still
have stock.
A
word of warning about gel filters; whilst these
can be mounted in Cokin type holders I found that
the length of exposures needed (anything up to
30 seconds) can allow sufficient visible light
to leak behind the filter and reflect off the
filter and any dust particles.
My solution is to sandwich a layer of the gel
between two screwin skylight filters. This stops
the light leakage and protects the filter.
|
| Taking
the Images
Because of the IR blocking filter, most digital cameras
have a much lower sensitivity to IR light than
they do to visible light. The result of this is
that exposures are long – depending on the camera,
subject, aperture and ISO setting used they can
be anything from 5-30 seconds – using a tripod
is strongly recommended, as is bracketing.
Correct white balance is important. The IR filter will
add a cast to the images, ranging from a strong
magenta to a strong red depending on the camera
and filter used, so it’s strongly recommended
to set the camera to a custom white balance. This
is usually done by taking a shot of a sheet of
white paper (with the IR filter fitted) then setting
the camera to calculate and use the white balance
from that – check your camera manual for the exact
method. If you shoot RAW, then this can be dispensed
with and the white balance chosen when processing
the images.
Framing the shot can be very difficult, especially when
using an R72 or Lee 87 filter, as there is hardly
any visible light transmitted. If you use screw-in
filters then you can set the framing up before
fitting the filter. Drop-in behind-the-lens filters
are a real pain but pre-framing can be done –
but don’t forget to put the camera body-cap on
whilst fitting the filter, to prevent dust getting
into the mirror box whilst you’re doing it. The
simplest solution I’ve found is not to use an
SLR – my Canon G5 can rather *********** well
through my preferred SFX filter, so I use that
and view it on the preview screen. As a committed
SLR user I knew I’d find a use for that screen
eventually ;-)
Focussing is the final hurdle to overcome. IR light focuses
at a different point to visible light and most
modern lenses don’t have an IR depth of field
scale – if they have a DOF scale at all. Older
lenses that had a proper DOF scale often had an
additional line for IR focussing. You can focus
manually using visible light then back it off
a little although how much requires practise.
A reasonably small aperture (f8 or so) will help
to correct any inaccuracy. If you have an autofocus
camera (thinks, are there any non-AF digitals?)
then your luck may be in. Provided that you don’t
use too dark a filter the camera may be able to
autofocus successfully, and that will take into
account the required shift for IR focussing. It’s
worth a try, even my Canon D30 (not the best of
AF systems in the world) can focus most of the
time with a Lee IR87 filter.
OK, we now have some images to work with, so let’s get
processing.
|
|
|
Conventional Monochrome IR processing
We’ll start off processing an image for the traditional
infrared black & white look. I shot this one
in RAW so didn’t worry about the white balance.
Here is how it looks when opened in RawShooter,
apart from the amount of foliage it’s very Martian.
|
|

|
After selecting a grey area of the clouds to set the
whitebalance, things look far better, so I convert
it and open in Photoshop.
A
quick Desaturate and Curves adjustment to bring
up the contrast gives me the finished image, ready
for framing.
|
 |
| False-colour
IR Processing
An interesting variation on infrared is to use some colour
but partially reverse the colours by swapping
the red and blue channels. This can produce striking
images but doesn’t work for all scenes.
This is another shot which I took in RAW, so once again
we have a strong red cast when opened in RawShooter.

Again, I select the whitebalance from a grey area of
cloud and convert it before opening in Photoshop.

To perform the Channel Swap go to Image->Adjustments->Channel
Mixer.

With the Red Output Channel selected (default) change
the Source Channels – Red to 0% and Blue to 100%.
Leave Green alone.

Now select the Blue Output Channel and change the Source
Channels – Red to 100% and Blue to 0%. Again,
don’t make any change to the Green channel.

Once I’ve done this, the image looks like this;

A
quick application of Auto Contrast and Auto Color
and this one’s ready to be framed as well.

I’ve automated the Channel Swap using a Photoshop Action
which you can get here
|
| Dealing
with “Hotspots”
As I said in the Cameras & Lenses section, the coatings
on some lenses can cause a bright hotspot in the
middle of the images. I found that my G5 does
give a hotspot but that it’s not too excessive,
and most of the effect can be edited out. If you
look closely at the false colour image you can
see a patch in the middle of the image that is
slightly brighter and slightly yellowy, this is
the hotspot.
It can’t be removed completely, but it can be
reduced – this is the method I use for my G5 images.
Once the image has been converted and opened in Photoshop
I make an oval selection somewhat larger than
the hotspot, and feather it by 200 pixels (Select->Feather)

I
then open Image->Adjustments->Hue/Saturation
and tweak the settings. Somewhere around Saturation
–40 and Lightness-10 usually does the trick

Now remove the selection (Select->Deselect) and perform
the Channel Swap as above. Once again, a quick
application of Auto Contrast and Auto Color finishes
it off.

|
|
|
|